Genuine Aid or Image Boosting?
Following the devastating Moroccan earthquake, Binance announced a donation of up to $100 in its BNB tokens to approximately 70,000 of its existing customers, totaling nearly $3 million.
However, the nature of this contribution raised eyebrows in the humanitarian aid sector. While cash, food, and essential items were desperately needed, Binance chose to provide digital tokens, leaving many to question its true intent and usefulness in a crisis situation.
A significant revelation was that the aid was specifically earmarked for its existing customer base. This move conveniently left out many non-Binance-affiliated victims, suggesting that the company’s interests took precedence over genuine humanitarian assistance.
Humanitarian experts, including Iain Overton of Action on Armed Violence, have publicly criticized such efforts as opportunistic.
For earthquake victims struggling to meet basic needs, the concept of digital tokens may seem out of touch at best and outright insensitive at worst. After all, someone grappling with the trauma of a natural disaster is unlikely to see the benefit of cryptocurrency over immediate tangible relief.
Binance’s Response Amid the Backlash
Despite the negative press, Binance remains firm in its stance. Their charitable division argues that cryptocurrency offers a fast, efficient, and transparent way to deliver aid across borders.
They also emphasize that recipients can convert these digital assets into their local currencies as needed. In an effort to enhance their philanthropic image, Binance has promised additional donations from publicly raised funds to local charities.
However, questions persist. Binance’s method for identifying eligible recipients, based on proof of residence in the Marrakech-Safi province, seems overly complex, especially during such a chaotic period.
Additionally, the tiered donation strategy, which provides varying amounts to recipients based on their proof and transaction activity, further raises doubts. This strategy has left many skeptics wondering if the primary goal was more about brand promotion than genuine relief.
Changpeng Zhao, Binance’s CEO, expressed hope that their donation would provide some relief to the affected individuals. He also encouraged recipients unaffected by the disaster to redirect the aid to those genuinely in need.
While noble in sentiment, this plea highlights the flawed approach: Why wasn’t this targeted aid delivered more effectively from the beginning? Furthermore, despite the touted benefits by the company, the real-world application of these tokens remains problematic.
It’s important to note that this is not Binance’s first encounter with controversy. The platform faces ongoing legal challenges in the U.S., including allegations of violating securities laws and mishandling customer funds. While unrelated to the Moroccan situation, these issues cast a shadow on Binance’s operations and intentions.
Conclusion
While any aid in the aftermath of a tragedy is valuable, the method of delivery is equally crucial.
Ecosystem
Research
News Network
About