New York Judge Orders Terraform Labs to Comply With SEC’s Investigative Subpoenas

ddddd 1

A recent court filing stemming from the Southern District of New York shows that a U.S. district judge has ordered the crypto startup Terraform Labs to comply with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) subpoenas. During the second week of November 2021, the U.S. regulator filed a subpoena enforcement action against Terraform Labs and the startup’s CEO, Do Kwon.

U.S. Regulator Gets New York Judge to Side With Investigative Subpoenas Plea

On February 17, 2022, a court order signed by the United States district judge J. Paul Oetken details that the startup Terraform Labs must comply with the SEC’s investigative subpoenas. In mid-November last year, the SEC filed subpoenas that attempted to compel Terraform Labs and its CEO Do Kwon to comply with the “fact-finding investigation.”

The investigation is due to Terraform Lab’s Mirror Protocol, an application that was launched in 2020, allowing users to trade mirrored assets tied to the price of U.S. securities. The SEC wants Terraform Labs and Kwon to explain why the court “should not compel them to produce documents as required by the subpoenas and compel Kwon to appear for testimony.”

A month prior to the enforcement action by the SEC, in October, Terraform Labs and Kwon revealed they were suing the U.S. regulator over serving the CEO the subpoena at a conference in New York. Terraform Labs (TFL) and Kwon insisted that the SEC lacks jurisdiction over the companies and the subpoenas were not served through the proper channels. The lawsuit against the SEC states:

The SEC attorneys were well aware that TFL and Mr. Kwon had consistently maintained that the SEC lacked jurisdiction over TFL and Mr. Kwon, and at no time asked Dentons lawyers whether it was authorized to accept service of subpoenas.

New York Judge: ‘Terraform and Kwon Are Hereby Ordered to Comply With the Referenced Subpoenas’

Despite the lawsuit against the SEC, last Thursday the Southern District of New York judge J. Paul Oetken ordered TFL and Kwon to comply with the regulator’s subpoenas. After the court had reviewed all the filings between both parties and listened to an oral argument by telephone conference, Oetken granted the SEC its wishes.

“For the reasons stated on the record at the February 17, 2022 conference, the SEC’s application is granted, and Terraform and Kwon are hereby ordered to comply with the above-referenced subpoenas,” Oetken’s order explains. The court filing adds:

This order is stayed for 14 days to permit further briefing regarding a potential stay pending any appeal of this order.

Mirror Protocol is still operational today and is the fifth-largest decentralized finance (defi) protocol on the Terra blockchain today. At the time of writing, the synthetics protocol for on-chain price exposure to real-world assets has $587.34 million total value locked (TVL). The SEC accuses TFL and Kwon of participating in “the creation, promotion and offer to sell assets and MIR tokens to U.S. investors.”

Tags in this story
court order, Crypto, Crypto regulation, District of New York, do kwon, investigative subpoenas, Judge J. Paul Oetken, LUNA, Mirror, Mirror Protocol, Regulation, SEC, Securities, Subpoenas, Terra, terra (LUNA), terraform labs, Terraform Labs compliance, testimony, TFL, The SEC, US Judge, US Regulation, US Regulators

What do you think about the New York judge’s court order to TFL and Do Kwon ordering them to comply with the SEC’s investigative subpoenas? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.

2Khomers
Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the News Lead at Bitcoin.com News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 5,000 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.




Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Read disclaimer